Money Market Funds
Operations and Technology
Happy Birthday ERISA! Congratulations on 40 Years
By Sarah Holden and Elena Barone Chism
September 2, 2014
Today marks the 40th birthday of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Signed into law on September 2, 1974, ERISA introduced bold steps to safeguard Americans’ employer-sponsored pensions and created the individual retirement account (IRA). Assets earmarked for retirement totaled $0.4 trillion at year-end 1974 (see the figure below). At this modest start, private-sector defined benefit (DB) plans accounted for 35 percent of the total; federal, state, and local plans for 34 percent; private-sector defined contribution (DC) plans for 17 percent; annuities for 13 percent; and there was a mere glimmer of IRA assets by year-end. Currently, total U.S. retirement assets are $23.0 trillion, and their composition has shifted considerably over the past 40 years.
U.S. Retirement Assets
Trillions of dollars, 1974–2014:Q1
Note: For detailed definitions of the components of U.S. retirement assets, see Investment Company Institute, “The U.S. Retirement Market, First Quarter 2014” (June).
Sources: Investment Company Institute, IRS Statistics of Income, Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Department of Labor, American Council of Life Insurers, and National Association of Government Defined Contribution Administrators
Today the largest single component of U.S. retirement savings is IRAs, with $6.6 trillion at the end of March 2014, representing 29 percent of the total. Congress created the traditional IRA to gather rollovers as well as contributions, and about half of IRA assets are the result of rollovers from employer-sponsored retirement plans (both DB and DC, from public as well as private employers). Federal, state, and local retirement plan assets account for about one-quarter of total U.S. retirement assets. Although these governmental plans are not covered by Title I of ERISA, many of the tenets of ERISA generally translate over to the rules governing these plans. And 401(k) plans—the rules for which were not in place until November 10, 1981—had $4.3 trillion in assets at the end of March 2014, or nearly one-fifth of total U.S. retirement assets.
Protecting Pension Assets and Enhancing Workers’ Receipt of Benefits
ERISA—which contained sweeping changes in the regulation of pension plans, and created rules regarding reporting and disclosure, funding, coverage and participation, vesting, and fiduciary duties—was a seminal moment in the development of U.S. pension policy, and led to further improvements. Regulations allowing workers to contribute wages or salary on a pretax basis (the 401(k) feature) were added in 1981. And though retirement plans faced regulatory headwinds in the 1980s, changes promoting retirement savings occurred again in the late 1990s. For example, as part of a package of reforms aimed at bolstering small businesses—the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (SBJPA)—Congress acted to encourage employers to offer retirement plans, including 401(k) plans.
Flanked by Congressional sponsors of the Act, President Gerald Ford signs ERISA into law on this day in 1974. His statement that accompanied the signing said it was “appropriate that this law be signed on Labor Day, since this Act makes a brighter future for almost all the men and women of our labor force.” Photo courtesy of PBGC and DOL.
In 2001, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act (EGTRRA) increased the annual DC plan contribution limit (albeit not higher than the limit in place in 1982), increased the limit on pretax elective deferral contributions, and allowed additional “catch-up” contributions for employees aged 50 or older. EGTRRA also permitted 401(k) plans to offer a “Roth” feature for after-tax contributions. (The Roth IRA, created by the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, allows tax-free withdrawals after the Roth IRA owner reaches age 59½, dies, or becomes disabled and a five-year holding period is met.) With the goal of preserving retirement accounts even when job changes occur, EGTRRA also increased opportunities for rollovers among various savings vehicles. The Pension Protection Act (PPA), passed in August 2006, made permanent EGTRRA’s higher contribution limits, and encouraged employers to automatically enroll employees in their 401(k) plans and offer appropriate default investments.
Both the Treasury Department and Department of Labor (DOL), through implementing regulations and guidance, have played key roles in the development of ERISA. For example, in 1992 DOL finalized its 404(c) regulation, providing a framework for offering participant-directed plans, while in 1996 it published important guidance on providing investment information and education to participants in these plans. In 2007, to implement changes included in the PPA, DOL crafted rules for qualified default investment alternatives (QDIAs) that have since led to the widespread use of target date funds and other more long-term focused investments for participants who are automatically enrolled or otherwise do not provide investment instructions. More recently, DOL undertook a comprehensive fee disclosure project requiring plan fiduciaries and plan participants to receive key information about the investments and services offered under plans.
Long before enactment of the PPA, Treasury—through IRS rulings in the late 1990s and early 2000s—gave the first official guidance confirming automatic enrollment as a permissible plan design. Over the years, Treasury and the IRS also have been instrumental in creating more plan options for small businesses, ensuring and encouraging portability between plans, and implementing Congress’s vision for Roth accounts in employer-sponsored plans and automatic enrollment arrangements.
A Public-Private Partnership
The past 40 years of U.S. pension policy aimed to help Americans build a retirement nest egg represents the combined efforts of a number of key players:
- Policymakers define the “rules of the road” to provide tax incentives for and protections around workers’ pension assets.
- Employers sponsor retirement plans (DB, DC, or both), designing their individual plans to attract and retain a quality workforce, meet the needs of their workers, and promote long-term thinking and retirement planning
- Financial services firms compete to offer administrative and investment management services to retirement plans, and develop innovative educational materials, tools, and calculators to promote the understanding of saving and investing.
- Individuals enroll in their plans at work and/or set up their own IRAs to defer some of today’s income for their future consumption.
Are You Taking Full Advantage of ERISA?
Today, on the 40th anniversary of ERISA, take time to reflect on your own preparations for retirement. Take stock of what Social Security will provide as a base of income for your retirement years. Review your current employer-sponsored retirement plan savings—have you taken advantage of all plans offered? Are you getting your full employer match? If you’re 50 or older, have you taken advantage of catch-up contributions? And, whether you have a plan at work or not, have you explored all IRA options for you and your spouse? (IRS regulations allow a working spouse to create an IRA for their nonworking spouse.)
You may also have a choice of tax treatment—traditional or Roth. Have you looked at your pension benefit statement, or the chart comparing the investment options in your plan? Finally, have you reviewed your investments for diversification, making sure you are comfortable with the mix of equities and fixed-income securities? (This is good to do periodically, regardless of whether you’re investing in target date funds or selecting investments on your own.) Now is a good time to make sure you are taking full advantage of the opportunities and tools resulting from 40 years of ERISA.
Sarah Holden is senior director of retirement and investor research at ICI, and Elena Barone Chism is associate counsel for pension regulation at ICI.
European Banks Significantly Reduced Borrowing from U.S. Money Market Funds in June
By Chris Plantier
July 18, 2014
As we discussed in March and April, European banks have generally become less willing to borrow from U.S. money market funds due to regulatory pressures, especially at the end of the quarter. Specifically, the new Basel III requirements seek to increase capital ratios of banks and explicitly limit how much banks fund their operations through short-term borrowing (which includes short-term securities banks issue that money market funds invest in). This quarter-end effect was particularly strong at the end of June as European bank regulators continued to monitor bank progress toward meeting the new Basel III requirements, which will be fully phased in over the next few years.
Some Facts About Roth IRAs and the Investors Who Use Them
By Todd Bernhardt
July 17, 2014
Since the individual retirement account (IRA) was created as part of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), it has become a resounding success, accounting for the largest pool of assets in the U.S. retirement market. By the end of 2013, Americans held $6.5 trillion in IRAs, with 45 percent of that total—$3.0 trillion—invested in mutual funds.
Industry Leaders Reflect on Serving Investors in an Evolving World
By Tina Kilroy
June 4, 2014
Speaking on the Leadership Panel held Wednesday, May 21, at ICI’s General Membership Meeting (GMM), fund industry leaders agreed that challenges as well as opportunities abound for their businesses in today’s complex world.
GMM Policy Forum: BlackRock’s Larry Fink Speaks with ICI’s Paul Stevens
By Todd Bernhardt
May 21, 2014
The fund industry needs to stop focusing on the moment and start focusing on outcomes when advising investors on their resources, said Laurence D. Fink, chairman and CEO of BlackRock, at ICI’s Annual Policy Forum, part of the Institute’s 56th General Membership Meeting (GMM).
Seasonality, U.S. Money Market Funds, and the Borrower of Last Resort
By Chris Plantier
April 16, 2014
The March money market fund holdings data indicate a large drop in the share of fund assets allocated to European counterparties and a large increase in the share of fund assets allocated to U.S. counterparties. This shift is likely temporary and reflects reduced willingness of European banks to borrow from money market funds at the end of the quarter, rather than reduced demand from money market funds. Also, the increase in lending to U.S. counterparties is almost entirely due to the large increase in money market fund lending to the Federal Reserve via its overnight reverse-repo (repurchase agreement) facility.
U.S. Prime Money Market Funds and European Borrowing
By Chris Plantier
March 18, 2014
European holdings by U.S. prime money market funds have fluctuated significantly since early 2011.
Washington: Put Your (Retirement) Money Where Your Mouth Is
By Mike McNamee
March 4, 2014
When President Obama announced a new effort to expand access to retirement savings opportunities, ICI was among the first to applaud. The Administration’s “myRA” looks to provide a new option for Americans who want to put money aside for retirement, but who might not have access to a retirement plan through their workplace. These accounts would complement the wide array of investment options already available to these workers.
Money Market Funds and Liquidity Ratios: Why So High and Stable?
By Chris Plantier
February 19, 2014
Second in a series of posts about ICI’s new data release, a monthly compilation and summary of portfolio data from taxable money market funds. To find out more, read the first post about the new data summary or this list of answers to frequently asked questions.
The SEC’s 2010 money market fund reforms require taxable funds to hold at least 30 percent of their assets in securities that are deemed to be liquid within five business days (known as weekly liquidity) and at least 10 percent of their assets in securities that are deemed to be liquid in one business day (known as daily liquidity). In practice, money market funds—especially government money market funds—hold liquidity well above these minimum standards, and these ratios change very little in any given month.
ICI’s New Data Release: Further Enhancing the Transparency of Money Market Funds
By Chris Plantier
January 21, 2014
The 2010 reforms to money market mutual funds greatly enhanced the transparency of these funds, giving regulators, analysts, and investors greater insight into important elements of funds’ holdings and operations.
The reforms required funds to disclose their entire portfolio holdings to the public on their company websites five business days after the end of each month. Money market funds also are required to file a more detailed disclosure—SEC Form N-MFP—with the Securities and Exchange Commission directly. The SEC releases this more detailed data to the public 60 days after it’s filed. The SEC does not, however, summarize the data, leaving the public with no non-commercial access to a broad look at holdings across the industry.
America’s Retirement System Is Strong
By Sarah Holden
December 18, 2013
One year ago, ICI released its landmark study, The Success of the U.S. Retirement System, a compilation of research from a wide range of sources, which found that the country’s retirement system is fostering economic security in retirement for Americans across all income levels.
ICI’s Guide to Avoiding a Common 401(k) Tax Trap
By Mike McNamee
December 9, 2013
A tax trap for retirement savings is catching many smart people unaware. If allowed to go unchecked, it could harm the retirement savings of millions of Americans. A columnist for the Washington Post was just the latest in a long list of victims.
Revenue Estimates of Restricting Tax Deferral: It Ain’t Necessarily So
By Peter Brady
September 20, 2013
Fifth in a series of posts about retirement plans and the policy proposals surrounding them.
In previous Viewpoints posts, I explained that retirement contributions are neither tax deductions nor tax exclusions, but rather are tax deferrals. I also explained why, in my opinion, the two most prominent proposals to restrict qualified deferred compensation are flawed (post three and post four).
Tax Reforms Should Not Favor DB Plans over DC Plans
By Peter Brady
September 19, 2013
Fourth in a series of posts about retirement plans and the policy proposals surrounding them.
In The Tax Benefits and Revenue Costs of Tax Deferral and in two previous Viewpoints posts (post one and post two), I explained the benefits that workers get from deferring tax on compensation set aside for retirement.
A ‘Modest’ Proposal That Isn’t: Limiting the Up-Front Benefits of Retirement Contributions
By Peter Brady
September 18, 2013
Third in a series of posts about retirement plans and the policy proposals surrounding them.
Marginal Tax Rates and the Benefits of Tax Deferral
By Peter Brady
September 17, 2013
Second in a series of posts about retirement plans and the policy proposals surrounding them.
In a previous Viewpoints post, I discussed the difference between tax deferral—the tax treatment applied to retirement savings—and tax deductions and exclusions, such as the mortgage interest deduction or the exclusion of employer-paid health insurance premiums from income. The difference is often overlooked or misunderstood, leading to inaccurate analysis and harmful policy proposals.
Retirement Plan Contributions Are Tax-Deferred—Not Tax-Free
By Peter Brady
September 16, 2013
First in a series of posts about retirement plans and the policy proposals surrounding them.
In today’s fiscal and political climate, taxes are never far from politicians’ minds. Whether to achieve comprehensive tax reform or to raise revenue to meet budget deficits, members of Congress are now considering changes to a range of tax code provisions—including those governing retirement policy. Any comprehensive effort to address fiscal policy or tax reform should examine every option, but some discussions of retirement policy have been misguided. The tax treatment of retirement savings—tax deferral— too often has been lumped together with tax deductions (such as the deduction from income of mortgage interest expense) and tax exclusions (such as the exclusion from income of employer-provided health insurance premiums).
Get a Closer Look at Closed-End Funds
By Daniel Schrass
July 30, 2013
ICI has recently updated several of its key closed-end funds resources.
Key Points to Remember on Fund Fees
By Sean Collins and Bob Grohowski
July 12, 2013
Over the past two decades, investors have paid less and less to own shares of mutual funds.
GMM Panelists Discuss Retirement Savings and Financial Education
By Miriam Bridges
May 17, 2013
Americans need greater access to savings vehicles and better financial education to help ensure that they use them effectively, fund industry experts told attendees at the 55th Annual General Membership Meeting.
At GMM Policy Forum, Secretary of Education Duncan Offers Steps to Address Education Crisis
By Miriam Bridges
May 9, 2012
America faces a skills crisis and other deep challenges in education, said U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan at the annual GMM policy forum, part of ICI’s 54th General Membership Meeting. In a conversation with ICI President and CEO Paul Schott Stevens, Secretary Duncan offered a range of ways to address these challenges, including specific recommendations for the fund industry.
‘One Size Fits All’ Doesn’t Fit Today’s Fund Investors
By Brian Reid
August 16, 2011
David F. Swensen is the chief investment officer of Yale University and a noted author of investment advice for the public. In books and articles over the last decade, he’s focused much of his attention on mutual funds. Yet he consistently ignores or is unaware of basic facts about how mutual funds operate, how investors seek and use funds, and how individuals manage their portfolios—gaps on full display in his latest commentary in the New York Times last weekend.
Check Your Savings Goals Next Week
By Sue Duncan
February 16, 2011
“America Saves Week” kicks off this Sunday, February 20. ICI and the ICI Education Foundation(ICIEF) encourage Americans to use the week as an opportunity to assess their savings activity and savings goals.
TOPICS: Investment Education